Late actor wished for dog to be put down and buried with him but family refused

Last updated on 5 SEP 2024

Alain Delon, the legendary French actor known for his captivating performances and iconic presence, left an indelible mark on the world of cinema. However, in the wake of his recent passing, a controversial final wish has sparked heated debate and widespread public interest. Delon, who had a profound love for animals, made an unusual request regarding his beloved dog Loubo that has left many questioning the boundaries between loyalty, love, and ethics. As the world mourns the loss of a cinematic giant, this final wish has opened a dialogue that transcends the silver screen, delving into the complex relationship between humans and their loyal companions.

Alain Delon and His Deep Bond with Loubo

Alain Delon, the legendary French actor, had a lifelong affinity for dogs, a bond that was especially evident in his relationship with his beloved Belgian Malinois, Loubo. Delon, who passed away at 88, often spoke of his deep connection with Loubo, referring to him as his “end-of-life dog.” This bond was not merely sentimental; Delon had over 50 dogs throughout his life, many of whom he buried on his estate, showing his profound attachment to his pets.

In a 2018 interview with Paris Match, Delon revealed that he loved Loubo “like a child” and expressed his wish that if he were to die before Loubo, he would prefer the dog to be euthanized and buried alongside him. He described a scenario where Loubo would be put to sleep in his arms, a testament to his desire for them to remain inseparable even in death. Delon feared that if left behind, Loubo might suffer and eventually die of grief at his grave, a fate he wanted to prevent​.

This bond and the controversial request that followed Delon’s death highlight not only the depth of his love for Loubo but also raise ethical questions about the extent to which human attachment should dictate the fate of animals. Delon’s children, acknowledging both their father’s wishes and the backlash from animal rights groups, ultimately decided to keep Loubo alive, ensuring that the dog remains cared for by the family.

Public and Family Response to Delon’s Wish

Alain Delon’s request to have his beloved dog Loubo euthanized and buried with him after his death sparked an intense public outcry, particularly from animal rights organizations. The French Society for the Protection of Animals (SPA) was among the most vocal critics, arguing that “the life of an animal should not depend on the life of a human.” They, along with other groups, offered to rehome Loubo rather than allow him to be euthanized, emphasizing that such actions could set a dangerous precedent for what is often termed “convenience euthanasia”​

The backlash from these organizations and the public led Delon’s family to reconsider. Despite the late actor’s expressed wishes, his children—Anthony, Anouchka, and Alain-Fabien—decided that Loubo would remain alive and be cared for by the family. Anouchka Delon confirmed this decision while speaking with the Brigitte Bardot Foundation, an organization deeply involved in the controversy, ensuring that Loubo would continue to live safely with the family​.

This decision was met with widespread relief, especially from animal welfare advocates who had rallied to save Loubo. The situation also triggered broader discussions about the ethical responsibilities of pet owners, particularly regarding end-of-life decisions for their pets​.

When Love Conflicts with Ethics: The Debate Over Pet Euthanasia

The controversy surrounding Alain Delon’s wish to have his dog Loubo euthanized and buried with him has raised significant ethical questions that extend beyond this singular case. At the heart of the issue lies a debate about the rights of pets versus the desires of their owners, particularly when it comes to end-of-life decisions.

Delon’s wish to have Loubo euthanized upon his own death was rooted in a deep emotional bond with the dog, whom he referred to as his “end-of-life dog.” He expressed a desire to spare Loubo from the potential suffering of being left behind, stating, “I would rather do this than to know he would let himself die on my grave.” While this request stemmed from a place of love and concern, it sparked an outcry from animal rights groups, who argued that the life of a healthy animal should never be sacrificed to satisfy human wishes​.

This incident has brought to light broader ethical considerations, particularly the concept of “convenience euthanasia,” where a pet is euthanized for the convenience or emotional comfort of the owner rather than due to the pet’s own health needs. Animal welfare organizations, such as the French Society for the Protection of Animals (SPA) and the Brigitte Bardot Foundation, were quick to condemn Delon’s request, advocating for Loubo’s right to live out his natural life. These organizations offered to rehome Loubo if necessary, highlighting the ethical responsibility to prioritize the well-being of pets over fulfilling personal desires​.

Moreover, the case has sparked a broader discussion on the legal and moral implications of pet euthanasia. In many countries, including France, pets are considered property under the law, allowing owners significant control over their pets’ fates. However, this legal framework is increasingly being challenged by those who argue that animals, particularly those who are healthy, should not be subject to decisions that do not serve their best interests​.

This debate is not just theoretical; it has practical implications for how society views pet ownership and the responsibilities that come with it. As experts in veterinary ethics and animal welfare suggest, decisions about euthanasia should be made with the animal’s quality of life as the primary concern, not the emotional needs of the owner. This perspective encourages a shift towards more compassionate and responsible pet care, where the focus is on ensuring the well-being of pets throughout their lives and in their final moments​.

The Delon case has also led to discussions about alternatives to euthanasia, such as rehoming pets or creating pet trusts that ensure they are cared for after the owner’s death. These alternatives emphasize planning and foresight, allowing pets to continue living even after their owner’s passing​.

Ultimately, Alain Delon’s wish and the subsequent public response have underscored the importance of ethical considerations in pet ownership. The incident serves as a reminder that the bond between humans and their pets, while deeply emotional, must be navigated with a sense of responsibility and respect for the life and autonomy of the animals involved.

Pet Ownership and Moral Responsibility: A Complex Debate

The saga surrounding Alain Delon’s wish to have his beloved dog Loubo euthanized and buried with him has not only highlighted the deep emotional connections we share with our pets but also stirred significant ethical debates that resonate far beyond the late actor’s personal desires. While Delon’s request was undeniably rooted in love and concern for Loubo, the overwhelming response from the public and animal rights groups has underscored a broader societal responsibility to prioritize the well-being and rights of animals.

This incident has illuminated the complexities involved in making end-of-life decisions for pets, especially when they intersect with human emotions and desires. It has challenged us to reconsider how we view our responsibilities toward the animals in our care, advocating for approaches that respect their autonomy and right to life. As the discussion around pet euthanasia continues, it is crucial to remember that our love for animals should guide us toward decisions that honor their lives, even in the face of our own mortality.

The legacy of Alain Delon, both as a cinematic icon and an animal lover, will be remembered not just for the films he made or the pets he adored but for the ethical questions his final wishes have brought to the forefront. These questions will continue to shape how we approach pet ownership, euthanasia, and the moral responsibilities we carry toward our loyal companions.

About Juice Juice